Re: Showing parallel status in \df+ - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Showing parallel status in \df+
Date
Msg-id 27617.1474562050@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Showing parallel status in \df+  (Rushabh Lathia <rushabh.lathia@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Showing parallel status in \df+  (Rushabh Lathia <rushabh.lathia@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Rushabh Lathia <rushabh.lathia@gmail.com> writes:
> I agree with the argument in this thread, having "Source code" as part
> of \df+ is bit annoying, specifically when output involve some really
> big PL language functions. Having is separate does make \df+ output more
> readable. So I would vote for \df++ rather then adding the source code
> as part of footer for \df+.

If it's unreadable in \df+, how would \df++ make that any better?
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.6 TAP tests and extensions
Next
From: AP
Date:
Subject: Re: Hash Indexes