Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies
Date
Msg-id 27598.1298919823@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies  (Marko Tiikkaja <marko.tiikkaja@cs.helsinki.fi>)
Responses Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies
List pgsql-hackers
Marko Tiikkaja <marko.tiikkaja@cs.helsinki.fi> writes:
> On 2011-02-28 8:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> So: exactly what is the intended behavioral change as of now, and what
>> is the argument supporting that change?

> The only intended change is what I was wondering in the original post: 
> snapshot handling between normal execution and EXPLAIN ANALYZE when a 
> query expands to multiple trees because of rewrite rules.  Like I said 
> earlier, this is just a bugfix now that wCTEs don't need it anymore.

OK, and which behavior is getting changed, to what?  I am not interested
in trying to reverse-engineer a specification from the patch.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: knngist - 0.8