Re: plperl needs upgrade for Fedora 10 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: plperl needs upgrade for Fedora 10
Date
Msg-id 27526.1225988998@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: plperl needs upgrade for Fedora 10  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: plperl needs upgrade for Fedora 10  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Re: plperl needs upgrade for Fedora 10  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Tom Lane escribi�:
>> BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) glibc-devel bison flex autoconf gawk
>> BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::Embed), perl-devel

> Huh, but the requirement for ExtUtils::Embed is at runtime, so shouldn't
> it be a plain Requires instead of BuildRequires?

Really?  I'm pretty sure I recall the RPM build failing when they
changed that.  (But it's possible that the regression test step is what
failed, I don't remember.)  I'd think I'd have heard about it if there
were a missing runtime dependency.

BTW, Andrew was wondering *why* Fedora isn't bundling these anymore.
The CVS logs mention something about versioned perl, so it's possible
that they had to split out some modules to support multiple Perl
installations cleanly.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: RAM-only temporary tables
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: plperl needs upgrade for Fedora 10