Re: initdb's -c option behaves wrong way? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Gustafsson
Subject Re: initdb's -c option behaves wrong way?
Date
Msg-id 274A0976-FF98-40E8-A4AB-235D10AC7B14@yesql.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: initdb's -c option behaves wrong way?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: initdb's -c option behaves wrong way?
List pgsql-hackers

> On 4 Mar 2024, at 02:01, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
>> I took the liberty to add this to the upcoming CF to make sure we don't lose
>> track of it.
>
> Thanks for doing that, because the cfbot pointed out a problem:
> I should have written pg_strncasecmp not strncasecmp.  If this
> version tests cleanly, I'll push it.

+1, LGTM.

--
Daniel Gustafsson




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Andrey M. Borodin"
Date:
Subject: Re: Comments on Custom RMGRs
Next
From: Bertrand Drouvot
Date:
Subject: Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation