Re: documention wrong or just not clear?

From: Tom Lane
Subject: Re: documention wrong or just not clear?
Date: ,
Msg-id: 27493.1174598948@sss.pgh.pa.us
(view: Whole thread, Raw)
In response to: documention wrong or just not clear?  (Robert Treat)
List: pgsql-docs

Robert Treat <> writes:
> In http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/routine-vacuuming.html it says:
> "The age column measures the number of transactions from the cutoff XID to the
> current transaction's XID. Immediately after a VACUUM, age(relfrozenxid)
> should be a little more than the vacuum_freeze_min_age setting that was used
> (more by the number of transactions started since the VACUUM started). "

> However my results don't seem to bear that out:

I would imagine that your database (or at least some of your tables) are
not yet vacuum_freeze_min_age transactions old.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-docs by date:

From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: documention wrong or just not clear?
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] no verification of client certificate?