Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
>> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> "Minimal" really fails to convey the point here IMHO. How about
>>> something like "suppress_no_op_updates_trigger"?
> I think it means something to us, but "no op" is a very technical phrase
> that probably doesn't travel very well.
Agreed --- I was hoping someone could improve on that part. The only
other words I could come up with were "empty" and "useless", neither of
which seem quite le mot juste ...
regards, tom lane
