Re: PHP + Postgres: More than 1000 postmasters produce - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Gellert, Andre
Subject Re: PHP + Postgres: More than 1000 postmasters produce
Date
Msg-id 2740724BDE77EC4CB3CF41EA2227845730B02B@NT-VISEXCH
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: PHP + Postgres: More than 1000 postmasters produce
Re: PHP + Postgres: More than 1000 postmasters produce
List pgsql-general
Hi Richard,

> Actually it's probably 8kB each = 16MB, but thats between
> *all* the backends.
> You probably want something a fair bit larger than this. Go to
>   http://www.varlena.com/varlena/GeneralBits/Tidbits/index.php
> and read the section on performance tuning and on the annotated
> postgresql.conf

I know this page and I corrected the values according to these hints,
but because of the immense problems ,i set them back to the same
values we use on the old servers.

> You can probably put vaccum_mem back up.

Because it is not rush hour now and i am leaving office for 3 days, I do
this on tuesday , to have a chance to roll back if errors occur.

> So - you let PHP open persistent connections to PG and have
> no limit to the
> number of different connections open at any one time?
> Turn the persistent connections off - you'll probably find
> your problems go away.

I have done this before, but when i remember right, the only effect is,
that every second dozens of postmaster processes started and closed, because
the connection is thrown away. This helps for now, as i can see on "low
traffic" , but when I tried first, we had heavy load just by starting this
large number of processes. There are 5-10 php skripts running per second, in
peeks maybe even twice or more.
This is a problem for the system , when for every process postmaster must be
started, or am I wrong ?

bye
Andre

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "scott.marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: PHP + Postgres: More than 1000 postmasters produce
Next
From: "scott.marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: PHP + Postgres: More than 1000 postmasters produce