Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 10:26:11PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> However, that's largely orthogonal to any of the things my proposed
>> patches are trying to fix. If you want to review the patches without
>> considering the fsync-error-handling problem, that'd be great.
> I have looked at them upthread, FWIW:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/YYtSj5vlWp5faVXz@paquier.xyz
> Your proposals still look rather sane to me, after a second look.
Pushed then; thanks for reviewing that. We can consider the fsync
error question at leisure.
regards, tom lane