Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Is "trust" really a good default? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Is "trust" really a good default?
Date
Msg-id 27325.1089662824@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Is "trust" really a good default?  ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>)
Responses Re: Is "trust" really a good default?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: Is "trust" really a good default?  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
"Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes:
> Is it really such a good idea to have "trust" authentication enabled for
> localhost (TCP/IP and Unix sockets) by default?

No, but none of the others are better.  See previous discussions in the
archives.  I don't think the situation has changed any since the last
time we hashed this out.
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Magnus Hagander"
Date:
Subject: Is "trust" really a good default?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Is "trust" really a good default?