Re: Bug in either collation docs or code - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Bug in either collation docs or code
Date
Msg-id 27318.1528476075@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug in either collation docs or code  (Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> writes:
> In this case, why treat implicit and explicit collation conflicts
> differently?

Um ... because the SQL standard says so?

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Transform for pl/perl
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Needless additional partition check in INSERT?