Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?
Date
Msg-id 2729258.1714764093@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>)
Responses Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> writes:
> On 03.05.24 10:39, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> They are no-ops when linking against v18, but writing an extension which
>> targets all supported versions of postgres along with their respective
>> supported OpenSSL versions make them still required, or am I missing something?

> I don't think extensions come into play here, since this is libpq, so
> only the shared library interface compatibility matters.

Yeah, server-side extensions don't really seem to be at hazard,
but doesn't the argument apply to client-side applications and
libraries that want to work across different PG/OpenSSL versions?

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: On disable_cost