Re: 8.2 beta blockers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: 8.2 beta blockers
Date
Msg-id 27291.1158588632@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 8.2 beta blockers  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jimn@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: 8.2 beta blockers  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jimn@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Jim C. Nasby" <jimn@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> One problem I see with userlock is that you're asking for lock ID
> conflicts unless you control everything on the system that's using
> userlocks.

Well, the lock IDs already include the database OID under the hood,
so you only need to control stuff within your database.  Beyond that,
yeah, it's your responsibility...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Reducing data type space usage
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: new language translation (.po)