Re: RangeTblEntry.inh vs. RTE_SUBQUERY - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: RangeTblEntry.inh vs. RTE_SUBQUERY
Date
Msg-id 2728763.1709236032@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RangeTblEntry.inh vs. RTE_SUBQUERY  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> On 2024-Feb-29, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I agree that perminfoindex seems to have suffered from add-at-the-end
>> syndrome, and if we do touch the field order you made an improvement
>> there.  (BTW, who thought they needn't bother with a comment for
>> perminfoindex?)

> There is a comment for it, or at least a61b1f74823c added one, though
> not immediately adjacent.  I do see that it's now further away than it
> was.  Perhaps we could add /* index of RTEPermissionInfo entry, or 0 */
> to the line.

That'd be enough for me.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dean Rasheed
Date:
Subject: Re: MERGE ... RETURNING
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: MERGE ... RETURNING