Re: [HACKERS] New version number 6.6 or 7.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] New version number 6.6 or 7.0
Date
Msg-id 27273.932398225@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] New version number 6.6 or 7.0  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> We can revisit this as the
> release gets closer, but to change it then, I am going to have to change
> PG_VERSION, and that will require initdb for everyone.  Perhaps just
> before we enter beta, we can discuss it, knowing then what our features
> will be.

We usually cause enough initdb's during a development cycle that another
one doesn't seem like a big problem.  Let's leave it at 6.6 for now, and
wait to see what the feature list looks like when it's time to start
beta.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Why DEFAULT text 'now' does not work for TIMESTAMP columns
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CVS