Re: text_pattern_ops and complex regexps - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: text_pattern_ops and complex regexps
Date
Msg-id 27269.1241642616@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: text_pattern_ops and complex regexps  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> ...  Maybe we should make that
> setting PGC_POSTMASTER (or just get rid of it?),

Another thought here: if we do get persuaded that the regex_flavor GUC
has to stay, we could eliminate it as a hazard for planning by changing
its scope to PGC_BACKEND.  That would be much less restrictive than
PGC_POSTMASTER; for instance it'd still work to set it for a particular
application via ALTER ROLE.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: text_pattern_ops and complex regexps
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: text_pattern_ops and complex regexps