Re: Re: JDBC 2.0 conformance, documentation and todo list - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Re: JDBC 2.0 conformance, documentation and todo list
Date
Msg-id 27261.997373914@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: JDBC 2.0 conformance, documentation and todo list  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-jdbc
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Barry Lind writes:
>> supportsANSI92EntryLevelSQL - Since postgres now does support outer
>> joins, I think the answer here should be yes.  I think the general
>> feeling is that if there is a deviation from entry level SQL92 it is a bug.

> Outer joins are not required for entry level SQL.  Nevertheless,
> PostgreSQL does not and probably will never comply with entry level SQL to
> the letter, so the answer "false" is correct.

I think the biggest remaining shortcoming compared to "entry SQL92" is
lack of schema support.  I haven't groveled through the spec in detail
to see what else is missing, however.  (Once we have schemas, we can
try to run the NIST compliance tests and see what they complain of...)

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: JDBC 2.0 conformance, documentation and todo list
Next
From: Rene Pijlman
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Bug found in the driver