Re: Add column name to error message? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Add column name to error message?
Date
Msg-id 27168.1395175494@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Add column name to error message?  (Edson Richter <edsonrichter@hotmail.com>)
Responses Re: Add column name to error message?  (Edson Richter <edsonrichter@hotmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Edson Richter <edsonrichter@hotmail.com> writes:
> Em 18/03/2014 17:17, Francisco Olarte escreveu:
>> Maybe they are not hiding it, but the error is raised by a value
>> checking routine which does not know where the value comes from / goes
>> to ( ie, it's a 'check_varchar(xx, maxlen), which is used to check
>> columns, function aprameters, type casts....) ( that happens to me in
>> my own code in some places where the context / error message is
>> extremely difficult to propagate down / up  ) .

> Thanks, Francisco. I don't know internals.
> But, doesn't the "value checking routing" caller's know which column is
> being tested?

No.  Typically all it would know is that it's evaluating a targetlist; the
fact that the resulting tuple is going to be inserted into some particular
table is known only at much higher levels (not even the same plan node).

I've thought about using our "errcontext()" mechanism to help with this,
but there's still a lot of additional infrastructure that would be needed
... and that infrastructure would not be without cost.  I'm afraid it
would result in measurable slowdowns in query execution.  Not sure if
people would think that's a good tradeoff.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Edson Richter
Date:
Subject: Re: Add column name to error message?
Next
From: Andy Colson
Date:
Subject: Re: Optimizing CartoDB's JenksBins function