Re: Request to have VACUUM ignore cost based limits - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Request to have VACUUM ignore cost based limits
Date
Msg-id 27155.1139465979@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Request to have VACUUM ignore cost based limits  ("Karl O. Pinc" <kop@meme.com>)
Responses Re: Request to have VACUUM ignore cost based limits  ("Karl O. Pinc" <kop@meme.com>)
List pgsql-general
"Karl O. Pinc" <kop@meme.com> writes:
> On 02/08/2006 09:46:46 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> What's wrong with SET?

> For my purposes at the moment, probably nothing.
> But isn't SET server wide?

No.  Perhaps you need to read
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/runtime-config.html#CONFIG-SETTING

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "surabhi.ahuja"
Date:
Subject: Re: loading pg_description ... FATAL: duplicate key violates unique constraint "pg_description_o_c_o_index"
Next
From: "surabhi.ahuja"
Date:
Subject: r trim of characters other than space