Re: FailedAssertion("pd_idx == pinfo->nparts", File: "execPartition.c", Line: 1689) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: FailedAssertion("pd_idx == pinfo->nparts", File: "execPartition.c", Line: 1689)
Date
Msg-id 2715413.1596768270@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: FailedAssertion("pd_idx == pinfo->nparts", File: "execPartition.c", Line: 1689)  (Andy Fan <zhihui.fan1213@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andy Fan <zhihui.fan1213@gmail.com> writes:
> I am not sure if we need to limit the scope to "between parsing and
> execution",

Yeah, there might be reason to add similar functionality in other
places later.  I'm not sure where yet --- but that idea does make
me slightly unhappy with the "delay_execution" moniker.  I don't
have a better name though ...

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: display offset along with block number in vacuum errors
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: public schema default ACL