Re: "invalid page header in block 597621 of relation..."error - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: "invalid page header in block 597621 of relation..."error
Date
Msg-id 27104.1132781802@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: "invalid page header in block 597621 of relation..."error  (Adam Witney <awitney@sgul.ac.uk>)
Responses Re: "invalid page header in block 597621 of relation..."error  (Adam Witney <awitney@sgul.ac.uk>)
List pgsql-general
Adam Witney <awitney@sgul.ac.uk> writes:
> Thanks for the help.... Here is the output:

> adam@bugsdb:/opt$ dd bs=8k skip=73333 count=1 if=134401991.4 | od -x
> 0000000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000
> *
> 0010000 1d9e 201c 0fa0 0000 0010 0000 0000 000b
> 0010020 0ca6 19fb 1797 0ab4 000a 0000 0000 0001
> 0010040 01af 0000 000a 0000 0000 0001 0ca7 0000
> 0010060 0012 0000 0000 0010 0002 1190 068f 0c9a
> ...

> Unfortunately I have no idea what any of that means!

The second half of the page looks reasonable, but the first half
is all zeroes :-(.  (dd uses "*" to mean "same as above".)

It's unlikely that this is Postgres' fault; I can't think of any
plausible pathology within PG that would so carefully zero out just
half of a page.  What seems more likely is that the block size on the
underlying filesystem is 4K, and that either a kernel bug or a disk
drive error has caused the system to drop the contents of one block.
If I had to bet with no additional info, I'd bet on kernel bug.  What's
the platform exactly, and what filesystem are you using?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Adam Witney
Date:
Subject: Re: "invalid page header in block 597621 of relation..."error
Next
From: Adam Witney
Date:
Subject: Re: "invalid page header in block 597621 of relation..."error