Re: how to handle missing "prove" - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: how to handle missing "prove"
Date
Msg-id 27081.1415049363@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: how to handle missing "prove"  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> On 11/3/14 3:11 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> If there's a commit that goes with this statement, you neglected to push it...

> Are you not seeing this in configure.in:

>   AC_CHECK_PROGS(PROVE, prove)
>   if test -z "$PROVE"; then
>     AC_MSG_ERROR([prove not found])

Oh, duh.  I read your message to mean that you'd just pushed a change
for that, not that it already did it.  Nevermind ...
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: how to handle missing "prove"
Next
From: Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Date:
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [HACKERS] Patch: add recovery_timeout option to control timeout of restore_command nonzero status code