Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Implement table partitioning. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Implement table partitioning.
Date
Msg-id 27080.1508344792@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Implement table partitioning.  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 4:53 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
>> My view is that the fact that partitioning uses inheritance is just an
>> implementation detail.  We shouldn't let historical behavior for
>> inheritance dictate behavior for partitioning.  Inheritance has many
>> undesirable warts.

> I don't think it's a good idea for table partitioning and table
> inheritance to behave differently.

I'm with Robert on this one.  I'd be in favor of changing both cases
to make ALTER OWNER recurse by default.
        regards, tom lane


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Implement table partitioning.
Next
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SIGSEGV in BRIN autosummarize