Re: Patch: Global Unique Index - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Laurenz Albe
Subject Re: Patch: Global Unique Index
Date
Msg-id 26fcfb7700783faa397c712ea9721090958e0e51.camel@cybertec.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Patch: Global Unique Index  (Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>)
Responses Re: Patch: Global Unique Index
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2022-11-29 at 13:58 +0100, Vik Fearing wrote:
> I disagree.  A user does not need to know that a table is partitionned, 
> and if the user wants a unique constraint on the table then making them 
> type an extra word to get it is just annoying.

Hmm.  But if I created a primary key without thinking too hard about it,
only to discover later that dropping old partitions has become a problem,
I would not be too happy either.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: Collation version tracking for macOS
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: An attempt to avoid locally-committed-but-not-replicated-to-standby-transactions in synchronous replication