Re: [HACKERS] transition table behavior with inheritance appearsbroken - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: [HACKERS] transition table behavior with inheritance appearsbroken
Date
Msg-id 269f5daa-54a0-77e5-c328-49b9a3602cfb@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] transition table behavior with inheritance appears broken  (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2017/06/19 7:59, Andrew Gierth wrote:
>>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes:
> > (Any preferences for whether it should be one commit or 3 separate ones?)

For my 2c, it would be nice to keep at least the inheritance one (or all
of them actually) separate.

Thanks,
Amit




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Phantom segment upon promotion causing troubles.
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Refreshing subscription relation state inside atransaction block