Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Why? libpq doesn't use rename, and I don't think it should be using
> Also, keep in mind that it will effect other clients who do use
> rename/unlink. The question is whether they assume Unix semantics on
> those commands. I don't know the answer, but I assumed they did.
I don't believe any of our standard clients care, and in any case libpq
is not the place to put it if they do.
>> unlink (someone *please* tell me that that unlink in getaddrinfo_unix
>> is a brain-dead error...)
> Not sure --- that's why I added it.
Even if it's correct (which I doubt) it's inside #ifdef
HAVE_UNIX_SOCKETS and therefore irrelevant to Windows.
regards, tom lane
