Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: regression coverage gaps for gist and hash indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Lakhin
Subject Re: regression coverage gaps for gist and hash indexes
Date
Msg-id 2678d2b3-279e-aed8-df20-333fe838f930@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: regression coverage gaps for gist and hash indexes  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: regression coverage gaps for gist and hash indexes  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Re: regression coverage gaps for gist and hash indexes  (Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
31.03.2023 15:55, Tom Lane wrote:
> See also the thread about bug #16329 [1].  Alexander promised to look
> into improving the test coverage in this area, maybe he can keep an
> eye on the WAL logic coverage too.

Yes, I'm going to analyze that area too. Maybe it'll take more time
(a week or two) if I encounter some bugs there (for now I observe anomalies
with gist__int_ops), but I will definitely try to improve the gist testing.

Best regards,
Alexander

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: POC: Lock updated tuples in tuple_update() and tuple_delete()
Next
From: Melanie Plageman
Date:
Subject: Re: Should vacuum process config file reload more often