Re: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem
Date
Msg-id 26782.990673338@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem  (Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>)
Responses Re: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem  (Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Unless we want to abandon MVCC (which I don't), I think an overwriting
>> smgr is impractical. 

> Impractical ? Oracle does it.

Oracle has MVCC?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: ADD/DROP CONSTRAINT and inheritance
Next
From: Hiroshi Inoue
Date:
Subject: Re: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem