Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum loose ends - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum loose ends
Date
Msg-id 26777.1122735333@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum loose ends  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum loose ends
List pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>>> I think you should at least add an autovacuum specific value for
>>> "vacuum_cost_delay" because it turns cost-based vacuum delay on or off.

> I am thinking we should move ahead with what we have now, suggest the
> work-arounds, and thensee what use-cases we have for it for later
> releases.

I think it's absolutely unquestionable that there is a use-case for
running autovac with different vacuum-delay settings than you would
want to apply to manually issued vacuums.  We don't need to wait for
field experience on that one; we already have it with the contrib
version.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Interval->day docs and regression tests
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum loose ends