Re: Got no response last time on setsockopt post, so I thought I would reiterate. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Got no response last time on setsockopt post, so I thought I would reiterate.
Date
Msg-id 26776.1181601638@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Got no response last time on setsockopt post, so I thought I would reiterate.  ("Dann Corbit" <DCorbit@connx.com>)
Responses Re: Got no response last time on setsockopt post, so I thought I would reiterate.  ("Dann Corbit" <DCorbit@connx.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Dann Corbit" <DCorbit@connx.com> writes:
> These two calls make our remote queries via libpq about twice as fast on
> average.

And, perhaps, cause even greater factors of degradation in other
scenarios (not to mention the possibility of complete failure on some
platforms).  You haven't provided nearly enough evidence that this is
a safe change to make.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Dann Corbit"
Date:
Subject: Re: Selecting a constant question
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Selecting a constant question