Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
> On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 23:57 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> That seems like a step backwards from the current behavior [...]
> Hmm, fair enough. Is this better?
Yeah, looks better, though I question the use of "embedded" in the
message --- seems a bit jargony. Are you going to post a revised patch?
regards, tom lane
