Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> You keep saying that but I think it's wrong. There are trivial patches that
> were submitted last year that are still sitting in the queue.
Um ... which ones exactly? I don't see *anything* in the current queue
that is utterly without issues, other than Heikki's ReadOrZeroBuffer
patch which certainly doesn't date from last year (and besides, has
now been applied).
I'm a bit more worried about stuff that may have slid through the
cracks, like the Darwin SysV-vs-Posix-semaphores patch that I complained
of in my triage listing. But the stuff that is listed on Bruce's patch
queue page is not "trivial". It's either large or has got problems.
regards, tom lane
