Re: A question on the query planner - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: A question on the query planner
Date
Msg-id 26699.1070423607@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: A question on the query planner  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
Responses Re: A question on the query planner  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: A question on the query planner  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-performance
Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>> Define "no longer works well".

> Well it seems to completely bar the use of a straight merge join between two
> index scans:

Hmmm ... [squints] ... it's not supposed to do that ... [digs] ... yeah,
there's something busted here.  Will get back to you ...

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: CHEWTC@ap.nec.com.sg
Date:
Subject: Minimum hardware requirements for Postgresql db
Next
From: Christopher Browne
Date:
Subject: Re: Minimum hardware requirements for Postgresql db