Re: Further pg_upgrade analysis for many tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Further pg_upgrade analysis for many tables
Date
Msg-id 26681.1358709108@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Further pg_upgrade analysis for many tables  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Further pg_upgrade analysis for many tables
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> !          *    Using pg_restore --single-transaction is faster than other
> !          *    methods, like --jobs.

Is this still the case now that Jeff's AtEOXact patch is in?  The risk
of locktable overflow with --single-transaction makes me think that
pg_upgrade should avoid it unless there is a *really* strong performance
case for it, and I fear your old measurements are now invalidated.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Further pg_upgrade analysis for many tables
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: fix corner use case of variadic fuctions usage