Re: BUG #19540: Inconsistent integer-to-octal formatting for permission GUCs in pg_settings (boot_val vs setting) - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: BUG #19540: Inconsistent integer-to-octal formatting for permission GUCs in pg_settings (boot_val vs setting)
Date
Msg-id 2665563.1782835088@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread
In response to BUG #19540: Inconsistent integer-to-octal formatting for permission GUCs in pg_settings (boot_val vs setting)  (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-bugs
PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
> Steps to reproduce:
> postgres=# SELECT name, setting, boot_val
> FROM pg_settings
> WHERE name IN ('data_directory_mode', 'log_file_mode',
> 'unix_socket_permissions');

> Actual Result :
>           name           | setting | boot_val
> -------------------------+---------+----------
>  data_directory_mode     | 0700    | 448
>  log_file_mode           | 0600    | 384
>  unix_socket_permissions | 0777    | 511
> (3 rows)

Yeah, the min and max columns are confusing too.  That's because
we entrust the formatting to the "show_hook" for those variables,
and those hooks are defined to show the current value only.

Looking through the existing show_hooks, all the other ones seem to
be used to account for situations where the effective value depends on
more than just the GUC variable itself.  Maybe we should say that
a show_hook should be used only for that purpose and not for specially
formatting the value?  We could deal with these cases by inventing a
new GUC flag, say GUC_SHOW_IN_OCTAL, that could be applied to all the
relevant values.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Daria Shanina
Date:
Subject: Re: Set huge_page_size on 32bit system
Next
From: surya poondla
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #19382: Server crash at __nss_database_lookup