Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 1:31 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Here's a draft patch for that. It wasn't quite as ugly as I feared.
>> A lot of the apparent bulk of the patch is because I chose to split
>> ExecEvalVar into separate functions for the scalar and whole-row
>> cases, which seemed appropriate because they now get different
>> ExprState node types.
> Thanks for that! Applying the patch and confirming the fix turned up
> no issues. I did a perfunctory review and it all looks pretty good:
> maybe ExecInitExpr could use a comment describing the
> InvalidAttrNumber check though...it's somewhat common knowledge that
> InvalidAttrNumber means row variables but it's also used to initialize
> variables before loops scans and things like that.
Thanks for testing. I added the suggested comment and made some other
cosmetic improvements, and have committed this.
regards, tom lane
