Re: Testing plperl<->plperlu interaction - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Testing plperl<->plperlu interaction
Date
Msg-id 26614.1263004489@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Testing plperl<->plperlu interaction  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: Testing plperl<->plperlu interaction  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Also, some commentary connecting this test to plperl.c's support for
>> two interpreters would be a good thing.

> ITYM in the .sql file(s)?

No, the test in the makefile is what seems to need a comment.  It
doesn't have to be much.  I was thinking something like

# if Perl can support two interpreters, test plperl-and-plperlu cases
ifeq ($(shell $(PERL) -V:usemultiplicity), usemultiplicity='define';)

BTW, what about the MSVC scripts?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira
Date:
Subject: Re: Add .gitignore files to CVS?
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Testing plperl<->plperlu interaction