Re: Mount options for Ext3? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Mount options for Ext3?
Date
Msg-id 26592.1043559288@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Mount options for Ext3?  (pgsql.spam@vinz.nl)
Responses Re: Mount options for Ext3?  (Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>)
List pgsql-performance
pgsql.spam@vinz.nl writes:
> If one were certain his OS wouldn't do any re-ordering of writes, would it be
> safe to run with fsync = off? (not that I'm going to try this, but I'm just
> curious)

I suppose so ... but if your OS doesn't do *any* re-ordering of writes,
I'd say you need a better OS.  Even in Postgres, we'd often like the OS
to collapse multiple writes of the same disk page into one write.  And
we certainly want the various writes forced by a sync() to be done with
some intelligence about disk layout, not blindly in order of issuance.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: relaxing link between explicit JOINs and execution order
Next
From: Ron Johnson
Date:
Subject: Re: Mount options for Ext3?