Re: Unhappy about API changes in the no-fsm-for-small-rels patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Unhappy about API changes in the no-fsm-for-small-rels patch
Date
Msg-id 26542.1555622089@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Unhappy about API changes in the no-fsm-for-small-rels patch  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> My compromise suggestion would be to try to give John and Amit ~2 weeks
> to come up with a cleanup proposal, and then decide whether to 1) revert
> 2) apply the new patch, 3) decide to live with the warts for 12, and
> apply the patch in 13. As we would already have a patch, 3) seems like
> it'd be more tenable than without.

Seems reasonable.  I think we should shoot to have this resolved before
the end of the month, but it doesn't have to be done immediately.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Unhappy about API changes in the no-fsm-for-small-rels patch
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: block-level incremental backup