Re: script binaries renaming - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: script binaries renaming
Date
Msg-id 26525.1206388741@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: script binaries renaming  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: script binaries renaming  (Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM>)
List pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Where are we on this?  Tom thinks we don't want this.  TODO has:
>     * Prefix command-line utilities like createuser with 'pg_'
>       http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-06/msg00025.php

> I think we need to make a decision.

Well, I don't have any particular objection to adding pg_ prefixes
as alternate names for the existing scripts.  However, it's not clear
what is the point unless we have the intention to remove the old names
at some time in the foreseeable future.  And the consensus of the
previous thread on -patches seemed to be that nobody except Zdenek
was very eager to do that.

In any case, there is no value in discussing this further on -patches
since the readers of this list already weighed in.  If you want to
make a decision then it needs to be made on -hackers or -general.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: "Pavel Stehule"
Date:
Subject: generate_subscripts
Next
From: "Pavel Stehule"
Date:
Subject: actualised execute using patch