Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables
Date
Msg-id 26517.1360016162@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 5:25 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> If the release notes are not already baked in, I would suggest this wording:

> +      The main consequence of this mistake is that it
> +      caused full-table vacuuming scans to occur much more frequently
> +      than intended.

It's baked ... sorry about that, but when making the notes there's
seldom time to go through the threads about every patch to see if the
commit messages are accurate or not.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: split rm_name and rm_desc out of rmgr.c