> On Aug 26, 2026, at 00:31, Zsolt Parragi <zsolt.parragi@percona.com> wrote:
> Not allowing these commands (consistently) to work on tables with
> invalid indexes is an option, but then that should be consistent
> across all similar commands, and it will be a behavior change for
> normal vacuum too.
I think your statement has its own answer embedded in it: It's acceptable for REPACK, a brand-new command, to have
differentbehavior in the presence of invalid indexes specifically because it would be a behavior change if we pushed
thatchange to other commands.
