Re: Materialized views WIP patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Materialized views WIP patch
Date
Msg-id 26479.1361461320@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Materialized views WIP patch  (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>)
Responses Re: Materialized views WIP patch  (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Peter claimed upthread that REFRESH is a subcommand of ALTER
>> MATERIALIZE VIEW

> It's not, nor do I think it should be.

Oh, never mind then.

>> and that this operation should be another one.� That sounds
>> pretty reasonable from here.

> That feels completely wrong to me.� For one thing, I can't think of
> any ALTER commands to populate or remove data.� What did you think
> of the idea of something like DISCARD MATERIALIZED VIEW DATA as a
> new statment?� Or maybe RESET MATERIALIZED VIEW?

I could live with either DISCARD or RESET.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Albe Laurenz
Date:
Subject: Re: FDW for PostgreSQL
Next
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: JSON Function Bike Shedding