Re: FDW, too long to run explain - Mailing list pgsql-general

From auxsvr
Subject Re: FDW, too long to run explain
Date
Msg-id 2645594.rQcIfVvf4p@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: FDW, too long to run explain  (auxsvr <auxsvr@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [External] Re: FDW, too long to run explain  (Vijaykumar Jain <vjain@opentable.com>)
List pgsql-general
Related to this question:

Postgresql cursors are in most cases I've tried extremely slow. The cause is as described in my previous answer, in my
experience.Is there any plan or way to improve this situation? For example, for FDW one would expect the plan on the
remoteside to be similar, if not identical, to the one locally, with the exception of the setup cost.
 
-- 
Regards,
Peter




pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: WSL (windows subsystem on linux) users will need to turn fsyncoff as of 11.2
Next
From: Vijaykumar Jain
Date:
Subject: Re: [External] Re: FDW, too long to run explain