Hi Jasen.
Thank you for your response (also thank you to Tom).
I have now tried your suggestion, but I'm not sure how you have implemented the plpgsql function. When I create the
function:CREATE update_rule_func( old record, new record ) AS ... I am told, that I cannot use record for the
parametertype. Could you please expand a little on your example ?
Leif
----- "Jasen Betts" <jasen@xnet.co.nz> wrote:
> On 2013-01-18, Leif Jensen <leif@crysberg.dk> wrote:
>
> > I have been fighting a problem with an update rule on a view. I
> > have a view that combines two tables where the 'sub' table (scont)
> can
> > have several rows per row in the 'top' table (icont). The view
> > combines these to show only one record per row in the top table. To
> be
> > able to update on this view I have created a rule 'on update'. The
> > rule needs to have both UPDATE, DELETE, and INSERT commands. Is
> this
> > not possible or am I doing something else wrong ?
>
> when I hit that issue in 8.4 i used a plpgsql function
>
> ... do instead select update_rule_func(old,new);
>
> --
> ⚂⚃ 100% natural
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
