Re: Dump/Reload pg_statistic to cut time from pg_upgrade? - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Dump/Reload pg_statistic to cut time from pg_upgrade?
Date
Msg-id 26325.1373474786@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Dump/Reload pg_statistic to cut time from pg_upgrade?  (Jerry Sievers <gsievers19@comcast.net>)
Responses Re: Dump/Reload pg_statistic to cut time from pg_upgrade?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-admin
Jerry Sievers <gsievers19@comcast.net> writes:
> Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com> writes:
>> Jerry Sievers <gsievers19@comcast.net> wrote:
>>> Planning to pg_upgrade some large (3TB) clusters using hard link
>>> method.� Run time for the upgrade itself takes around 5 minutes.
>>> Unfortunately the post-upgrade analyze of the entire cluster is going
>>> to take a minimum of 1.5 hours running several threads to analyze all
>>> tables.� This was measured in an R&D environment.

At least for some combinations of source and destination server
versions, it seems like it ought to be possible for pg_upgrade to just
move the old cluster's pg_statistic tables over to the new, as though
they were user data.  pg_upgrade takes pains to preserve relation OIDs
and attnums, so the key values should be compatible.  Except in
releases where we've added physical columns to pg_statistic or made a
non-backward-compatible redefinition of statistics meanings, it seems
like this should Just Work.  In cases where it doesn't work, pg_dump
and reload of that table would not work either (even without the
anyarray problem).

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Jerry Sievers
Date:
Subject: Re: Dump/Reload pg_statistic to cut time from pg_upgrade?
Next
From: Wells Oliver
Date:
Subject: Upgrading from 9.1 to 9.2 in place, same machine