Re: O_NOATIME - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: O_NOATIME
Date
Msg-id 26312.1154639188@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: O_NOATIME  (Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com>)
Responses Re: O_NOATIME
List pgsql-hackers
Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Isn't that usually, and more portably, handled in the filesystem
>> mount options?

> Yes to both.  I could imagine that for small systems/workstations
> you might have some files that want access time, and others that
> wanted NOATIME -- it seems the new flag lets you choose on a
> file-by-file bases.

Personally, if I were an admin who wanted access times, I'd regard
the existence of such a flag as a security hole.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: User-defined typle similar to char(length) varchar(length)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] tg_trigtuple/tg_newtuple settings in AFTER triggers