Re: libpq compression - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: libpq compression
Date
Msg-id 26283.1339947738@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: libpq compression  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: libpq compression
Re: libpq compression
List pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> Is there a reason why we don't have a parameter on the client
> mirroring ssl_ciphers?

Dunno, do we need one?  I am not sure what the cipher negotiation process
looks like or which side has the freedom to choose.

> That, or just have DEFAULT as being the default (which in current
> openssl means ALL:!aNULL:!eNULL.

If our default isn't the same as the underlying default, I have to
question why not.  But are you sure this "!" notation will work with
all openssl versions?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Broken system timekeeping breaks the stats collector
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: libpq compression