Re: Need to tune for Heavy Write - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Nicholson, Brad (Toronto, ON, CA)
Subject Re: Need to tune for Heavy Write
Date
Msg-id 2626AEE4839D064CB0472A3814DC403F46DA2F2222@GVW1092EXB.americas.hpqcorp.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Need to tune for Heavy Write  (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Need to tune for Heavy Write
List pgsql-performance
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-performance-
> owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Scott Marlowe
> Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 4:46 AM
> To: Willy-Bas Loos
> Cc: Adarsh Sharma; pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Need to tune for Heavy Write
>
>
> > Moving the pg_xlog to a different directory only helps when that
> > directory is on a different harddisk (or whatever I/O device).
>
> Not entirely true.  By simply being on a different  mounted file
> system this moves the fsync calls on the pg_xlog directories off of
> the same file system as the main data store.  Previous testing has
> shown improvements in performance from just using a different file
> system.
>

Is this still the case for xfs or ext4 where fsync is properly flushing only the correct blocks to disk, or was this
referringto the good old ext3 flush everything on fysnc issue? 

Brad.


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Dusan Misic
Date:
Subject: Re: Need to tune for Heavy Write
Next
From: Nassib Nassar
Date:
Subject: Seq Scan vs. Index Scan