Re: Rule flag in gram.y - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Rule flag in gram.y
Date
Msg-id 26257.996879346@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Rule flag in gram.y  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> There is some code in gram.y that detects whether you are in a RULE so
> NEW/OLD can be detected.  Seems the value is reset on parser start and
> set on RULE start, but not reset on rule and.  A multi-query string
> could use NEW/OLD in the queries after the RULE even though they are
> invalid.  The following patch fixes this by resetting the flag when the
> rule action happens.

I was about to say "fix ecpg's grammar too", but a quick look shows that
Michael was way ahead of the rest of us on this one ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Name for new VACUUM
Next
From: Giles Lean
Date:
Subject: Re: SIGCHLD handler in Postgres C function.