Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com> writes:
> We intend to implement $subject, so instead of
> mycursor CURSOR (myparm text) IS SELECT myparm;
> OPEN mycursor('A');
> it would be possible to do
> OPEN mycursor(myparm := 'A');
Is this really worth the trouble? Is it supported by any other DBMS?
Are cursors used so much, or with so many parameters, that there's a
real benefit to be gained? (I tend to think that FOR loops are better
than cursors 99% of the time.)
I wouldn't be so obstructionist if this syntax weren't in flux.
But seeing that we have hopes of migrating from := to => before
very long, adding another dependency on that choice where it's
not buying a lot of functionality doesn't seem like a good idea.
regards, tom lane
